Profession

Georgia liability plaintiffs don't have to waive privacy

The court ruling is the second against provisions in the state's recent tort reform.

By Amy Lynn Sorrel — Posted Aug. 14, 2006

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A Georgia appeals court in July struck down a portion of a medical liability tort reform package that would have required plaintiffs alleging negligence to authorize disclosure of their medical records to defendants. Under the statute, a case would have been subject to dismissal if the plaintiff didn't file a privacy waiver.

In a 6-1 decision, judges ruled that HIPAA preempts the law because the federal law's standards ensure that private health information is protected from unauthorized release.

Judge Gary Blaylock Andrews dissented, however, arguing that the statute does not violate HIPAA because the Georgia law gives plaintiffs adequate notice that they must waive certain privacy rights related to their alleged injury if they are going to file a complaint.

"It's an issue of fairness," said Donald J. Palmisano Jr., general counsel of the Medical Assn. of Georgia, which filed an amicus brief in the case supporting the state's tort reform measure. "This authorization is just a confirmation of what the plaintiff already knows, so why can't the defense have the same opportunity in preparing a case and the same rights to explore that plaintiff's medical history?"

The July ruling is the latest to chip away at reforms passed last year. In February, the state Supreme Court overturned the venue portion of the law that would have allowed defendants to transfer medical liability lawsuits to the county where the alleged negligence occurred.

Palmisano added that the most recent decision is unlikely to affect other reforms aimed at reducing frivolous lawsuits. At press time, there were no plans to appeal the ruling.

The Georgia statute includes a $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages, which Palmisano said he expects to be challenged. However, he said, "We believe the cap is constitutional."

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn