government

States sue federal government over tighter SCHIP limits

The Bush administration wants proof that low-income kids are enrolled. State officials say HHS changed enrollment standards without getting public input.

By — Posted Oct. 22, 2007

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Four states joined in a lawsuit and a fifth filed its own to block new rules limiting eligibility for the State Children's Health Insurance Program.

The group lawsuit, filed Oct. 4 in a federal court in New York, says the Dept. of Health and Human Services should have provided the public notice and comment period required by law for program changes as significant as those in its Aug. 17 guidance.

The new rules would strictly limit states' ability to get SCHIP matching funds for children in families earning more than 250% of the federal poverty level, or $42,925 for a family of three. States first would have to prove they have enrolled 95% of children at or below 200% of the poverty level in the program. They also would have to show that private health insurance enrollment had not declined more than two percentage points among targeted income groups and that new program enrollees had been uninsured for one year.

At least 16 states have SCHIP eligibility limits higher than 250% of poverty. They have until Aug. 17, 2008, to meet the new criteria or they will receive Medicaid-level federal matching funds, which are lower than those for SCHIP, for children in families above 250% of poverty.

Late last month, Congress adopted a compromise SCHIP reauthorization bill that would nullify the new rules, but President Bush vetoed it on Oct. 3. As of press time, bill supporters were trying to gather support for a veto override.

"If in fact these rules go into place, it will severely curtail the ability of the states to continue our programs to provide health care to low-income families," said Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire.

The lawsuit's plaintiffs are Illinois, Maryland, New York and Washington. Five other states plan to file supporting briefs. Of these nine states, at least seven have previously sought or are now seeking to expand their SCHIP eligibility limits, according to Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. New York, for example, wanted to increase its eligibility from 250% to 400% of poverty, but HHS rejected the request last month based on the Aug. 17 rules.

New Jersey, whose SCHIP eligibility is 350% of poverty -- the highest in the U.S. -- filed a separate lawsuit based on similar grounds.

HHS had nine years of consenting to New Jersey's various SCHIP requests, said Heather Howard, health policy counsel for New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine. "Now they have an entirely different interpretation of the statute," she said. HHS hadn't filed a response to the lawsuit as of press time.

Gregoire said it is impossible to meet the rule requiring enrollment of 95% of children in families earning 200% of poverty or less. No state has enrolled more than 92% of that demographic. "This is not a secret to HHS," she said.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services spokesman Jeff Nelligan said the administration just wants to make sure the truly uninsured and low income are first in line for SCHIP. "We are confident that our requirements are appropriate and will be sustained in a court of law."

Gregoire said the four states will withdraw their lawsuits if Congress adopts legislation nullifying the Aug. 17 guidance. "Our priority No. 1 is the [veto] override. But we felt it was important that we move forward with the lawsuit at this point," she said.

New York Gov. Elliot Spitzer said, "It is a tragic day when we have to sue our own president for denying health care coverage to children who cannot afford it."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Most plaintiffs exceed new limits

Five states are suing to block new federal restrictions on State Children's Health Insurance Program eligibility. The rules make it difficult for states to cover children in families earning more than 250% of the federal poverty level. Here are the income eligibility requirements in the plaintiff states:

Illinois: No limit

Maryland: Up to 300% of poverty

New Jersey: Up to 350% of poverty

New York: Up to 400% of poverty. The federal government rejected New York's proposal to expand eligibility to 400% of poverty.

Washington: Up to 250% of poverty. Washington's eligibilty level rises to 300% in 2009

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn