Government

EMR adoption higher in states with fewer privacy rules

Privacy advocates say it's the cost, not state restrictions, that slows adoption rates.

By — Posted May 4, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

State laws in place to protect patients' confidentiality may be causing some hospitals to be more skittish about adopting electronic medical records systems, a factor that could impede the push for the industry to go paperless, a study says.

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Virginia recently concluded that state privacy regulations reduce aggregate EMR adoption by between 20% and 30%. States that got rid of some of their regulations experienced a 21% gain in hospital EMR adoption rates around the years the laws changed compared with just an 11% gain in states that kept them intact, said the study.

The authors concluded that state laws could hinder the federal government's goal of achieving industry-wide interoperability. Earlier this year, Congress allocated roughly $20 billion over 10 years in economic stimulus funding toward Medicare and Medicaid bonuses for physicians, hospitals and others that adopt paperless systems.

"What needs to happen is a lot more coordination of these privacy laws so hospitals don't have to deal with these patchwork systems," said Catherine Tucker, PhD, assistant professor of marketing at MIT's Sloan School of Management and one of the report's authors.

Several hospitals reported difficulties in exchanging information with systems in other states due to filters that must be installed to ensure that the transactions are done according to law, she said. "The extent you have to customize becomes very costly when you try to exchange health information," Tucker said.

Tucker used data from the 2005 release of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics Database for the research along with survey data from the American Hospital Assn. from 1995 to 2005. Data from more than 2,900 hospitals were analyzed.

The researchers measured adoption rates by whether hospitals had installed or were in the process of installing enterprise EMR systems or basic software with the capability for potential add-ins, such as clinical decision support and data repositories.

The study's findings were met with skepticism from some privacy advocates, who argued that uniformity exists between the states regarding privacy laws, contrary to what the researchers concluded.

Deborah Peel, MD, a psychiatrist and chair of the Patient Privacy Rights Foundation, a watchdog group based in Austin, Texas, said many states have laws that follow the standards set in the American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics, which helps provide strong protections for health information.

"The idea that there are somehow states in the U.S. that have vastly different laws protecting health information privacy is a fallacy," Dr. Peel said. If any factors are impeding EMR adoption, they are cost and system architectural designs that make them hard to maintain and support, she said.

Cost was cited as the No. 1 factor for low adoption rates of hospital paperless records systems in a study published in the March 25 online version of the New England Journal of Medicine. That study found only 1.5% of nonfederal U.S. hospitals use a comprehensive system, and only about 8% use a basic system in at least one unit that includes physician or nurse notes.

Deven McGraw is director of the health privacy project at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a public policy organization based in Washington, D.C. She dismissed the study's findings as well, noting "there have been a lot of developments that have happened since they looked at the data," such as the passage of the most recent economic stimulus bill.

Dr. Peel said she's concerned that policymakers could look at this study and use it as a rationale for scaling back patient privacy protections, which she said are jeopardized as it is by the private data-mining industry. "It's far more lucrative than taking care of sick people. The data is going everywhere we don't want it to go. And the two people who should have it -- the patient and their doctor -- can't get their hands on it."

AMA policy supports prohibiting the sale and exchange of personally identifiable health information for commercial purposes without a patient's consent.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

State privacy laws

A new study suggests that state privacy laws aimed at protecting patients' medical data may inhibit the adoption of electronic medical record systems by hospitals. As of 2002, one year on which the study focused, nearly half of states had privacy protections affecting hospitals.

States with privacy protection: Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Source: "Privacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Records," University of Virginia and MIT Sloan School of Management (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story