EMR meaningful use rules warrant gradual approach

CMS should let physicians take incremental steps and still qualify for Medicare and Medicaid financial incentives, says a trade group of hospital CIOs.

By — Posted March 17, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

CORRECTION: This article, which posted March 17, incorrectly reported that the American Medical Association had not commented on the EMR meaningful use guidelines. The AMA and other medical organizations presented their comments on March 15, after this article was completed but before it was posted. American Medical News regrets the error. Coverage of organized medicine's comments has been posted. link.

An all-or-nothing approach is wrong for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services if it wants to give physicians a realistic chance to qualify for incentives for meaningful use of electronic medical records, says the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives.

The trade group for hospital chief information officers sent its public comment to CMS regarding the interim final rules for meaningful use of electronic medical records.

Among CHIME's suggestions: a gradual implementation process that would allow physicians to qualify for incentives by achieving 25% of meaningful use objectives by 2011, 50% by 2013, 75% by 2015, and 100% by 2017.

"Without an approach that rewards progress or provides sufficient time, organizations with limited resources will likely have little chance of qualifying for payments, thus widening the 'digital divide' in the country," CHIME wrote.

The organization issued a statement along with the release of the letter, saying it hoped its comments would prove useful to other organizations crafting responses to the rule.

The statement was released on Feb. 26, two days before the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society kicked off its annual meeting, much of which focused on meaningful use.

HIMSS held a town hall meeting at which it detailed its response to the rules. The organization also heard from members on what they thought should be included in the response. The organization said it planned to use all the allotted time to respond before the March 15 deadline.

The American Medical Association has not written a formal public comment to CMS on the interim final rules. But in June 2009 it co-signed a letter with 81 state medical societies that said EMR objectives recommended by a federal advisory board for inclusion in the rules appeared too aggressive and inflexible. In January it published an outline of the meaningful use criteria with guidelines for physicians who want to meet the requirements (link).

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story