profession

Tort reform faces constitutional challenge in Washington

The state Supreme Court will decide if patients need to give doctors advance warning of lawsuit filings.

By Amy Lynn Sorrel — Posted March 26, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Washington Supreme Court justices on Feb. 25 heard oral arguments in a case that will decide the fate of a tort reform measure aimed at curbing unnecessary medical liability litigation.

The 2006 law requires patients to notify defendants of any intentions to sue at least 90 days before filing a medical liability action.

Dental patient Nancy Waples has asked the high court to declare the measure unconstitutional, alleging that it sets a higher bar for medical liability cases and violates her equal protection rights. An appeals court rejected those arguments in 2008, when it dismissed a negligence suit Waples filed against her dentist because she failed to file the required prelitigation notice.

Physicians noted that the Legislature passed the reform to preserve access to care by promoting settlements and tempering rising medical liability costs. Those are legitimate state goals that the courts should not second-guess, according to a friend-of-the-court brief filed by the Washington State Medical Assn. and Physicians Insurance A Mutual Co., one of the state's largest medical liability insurance carriers.

Doctors also disputed arguments by trial lawyers that the law immunizes physicians from lawsuits and hurts patients' access to the courts. The statute does nothing to foreclose patients' ability to sue and, at best, imposes modest delays that are nonetheless aimed at resolving such cases, the physicians' brief said.

The Washington State Assn. for Justice, a state trade group for plaintiff lawyers, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Waples v. Yi, asking the high court to overturn the law.

The suit follows a September 2009 high court decision declaring unconstitutional a separate reform measure that required plaintiffs to file an affidavit from an expert certifying a lawsuit's merit.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story