business

Health plans' huge earnings spark fallout from politicians

Insurers, however, plan to stick with their strategy of maximizing rates while minimizing costs.

By Emily Berry — Posted Aug. 16, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Health insurance executives say that, despite political backlash toward their profits and pricing, they will continue to push medical spending lower and keep premiums at the greatest possible margin above costs.

The statements came as the seven largest publicly traded health insurers generally reported second-quarter profits above analysts' expectations.

The plans credited lower health spending, in large part due to money set aside for a flu epidemic that wasn't as bad as expected, and in part because even insured patients were spending less on health care. The plans also credited their own "pricing discipline" -- keeping premiums as high as possible, even at the risk of losing members and standing with politicians.

During a second-quarter earnings conference call between UnitedHealth Group executives and investment analysts, Citigroup's Carl McDonald asked if the company was bracing for more resistance to rate increases and "pricing to trend" -- setting premiums higher as medical costs rise, allowing for consistent or even growing profit margins.

Given the political environment and the company's historic profit margins, which he cited at 7%, McDonald wondered if UnitedHealth Group could keep up those price increases. United said, yes it can.

"I think that you can still price to trend. I think that is the appropriate long-term positioning of the organization," CEO Stephen Hemsley said.

Five of the seven largest shareholder-owned health plans -- Aetna, Health Net, Humana, UnitedHealth Group and WellPoint -- reported profits in the second quarter of 2010 better than the same period in 2009.

But all seven companies raised their estimates of the total profit they will bring in for the full year.

Net income for the quarter ranged from $1 million for Coventry Health Care to $1.1 billion for UnitedHealth Group. Coventry was charged $278 million for a class-action lawsuit settlement regarding its workers' compensation business in Louisiana.

United's per-share profit of 99 cents was up 37% from the same quarter in 2009, but that wasn't even the largest increase among the biggest seven insurers. Aetna reported earnings of $491 million, or $1.14 per share, a 48% jump, Humana and WellPoint reported a 20% jump in per-share earnings compared with the second quarter of 2009. Coventry earnings would have been up without the settlement.

Cigna's health insurance business did better than expected, but the company saw earnings drop because of losses in nonhealth business.

Most of the big health plans lost members and brought in lower revenue than the prior year but were still able to make a profit because of lower medical spending. For several insurers, a milder-than-anticipated flu season made a critical difference to earnings, allowing them to count as revenue money that had been set aside, but not spent, for the influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. For some plans, such as WellPoint, that turned around what would have been a profit decline from the second quarter of 2009.

Insurers also credited their care management programs and continued economic pressure that appeared to keep members from spending on care.

However, the debate over rates and the potential for further backlash as new health system rules take shape tempered investors' response to health plan earnings.

U.S. Reps. Pete Stark (D, Calif.) and Jan Schakowsky (D, Ill.) released separate statements demanding that insurers lower premiums in light of recent rate increases. They are co-sponsors of legislation, introduced July 22, that would establish a public health insurance option to be included in health insurance exchanges created by health system reform.

Schakowsky said the "windfall" quarterly profits "are the umpteenth example of why this industry needs to be checked."

Coventry and Cigna were the only plans Stark didn't mention by name in multiple releases chiding health plans. He put out a release July 28 slamming WellPoint, Aetna and UnitedHealth Group, then followed up with statements on Humana's Aug. 2 earnings report and Health Net's Aug. 3 earnings report.

"Last week we found that WellPoint and Aetna were reaping hundreds of millions more in profits while spending hundreds of millions less on health care," Stark said in the Aug. 2 release.

"Today's report shows another insurer having a banner year. I await announcements by Humana and other insurers that they will be passing along these billions to consumers in the form of lower premiums."

That doesn't appear to be in the cards. Angela Braly, WellPoint's CEO, president and chair, said during her company's quarterly conference call that she's confident her company will be able to get future rate increases approved despite resistance in some states in 2009 and 2010 -- most famously, in California, where a proposed 39% maximum increase for individual plans was credited with relighting the fire to get health system reform passed.

"We expect that over time, appropriate rates will be granted in order to sustain this important market segment for the many Americans it will serve," Braly said. "This market is projected to expand by 16 million people during the next decade as a result of health care reform, and creating a fundamentally sustainable marketplace will be critical."

The American Medical Association was critical of health plans after the release of the earnings reports, citing numbers that show rate hikes outpacing health spending overall and physician services in particular.

"Huge premium hikes and windfall earnings from the health insurance industry are out of step with the latest figures showing the slowest rate of growth in U.S. health care spending in nearly 50 years," said AMA Immediate Past President J. James Rohack, MD. "Spending for physician and clinical services grew 5%, the slowest rate of growth since 1996.

"While insurers propose double-digit price increases, the latest figures show prices for physician services increased by only 2.7%. In fact, inflation adjusted physician fees decreased by 25% between 1996 and 2006. More oversight is needed to make certain that insurers are not funding their multibillion-dollar merger and acquisition strategies on the backs of patients, physicians and employers."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Higher premiums, higher profits

Most of the seven largest shareholder-owned health plans took in higher profits in the second quarter of 2010 than the same period in 2009, despite declining membership and lower revenue. Lower medical spending and an unexpectedly mild flu season boosted earnings. Company executives do not plan to back off requests for higher premiums where they believe them to be necessary, however. Dollars are in millions.

RevenueNet incomeEarnings per share
Plan2Q092Q10 (change)2Q092Q102Q092Q10 (change)
Aetna$8,671$8,546
(-1%)
$347$491$0.77$1.14
(48%)
Cigna$4,488$5,353
(19%)
$435$295$1.58$1.06
(-33%)
Coventry$3,537$2,868
(-19%)
$18$1$0.12$0.01
(-92%)
Health Net$4,014$3,442
(-14%)
$40$45$0.38$0.45
(18%)
Humana$7,899$8,653
(10%)
$282$340$1.67$2.00
(20%)
United$21,655$23,264
(7%)
$859$1,123$0.73$0.99
(37%)
WellPoint$15,413$14,457
(-6%)
$694$722$1.43$1.71
(20%)

Source: Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission

Back to top


Coventry takes hit from class-action lawsuit

Coventry Health Care reported steeply rising operating profits for the second quarter of the year, but its earnings were cut to a penny per share due to a court decision in a class-action lawsuit brought by four Louisiana physicians, among others. The Louisiana 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the company to pay plaintiff health care professionals and hospitals $278 million, representing fines, plus interest.

"We are still working hard and pursuing all avenues of appeal for the Louisiana court decision, which we believe is not supported by either the law or the facts," Coventry CEO and Chair Allen Wise said during a second-quarter earnings conference call with investment analysts July 30.

In 2008, physicians, chiropractors and hospitals sued Coventry subsidiary First Health Group, which operates a workers' compensation rental preferred providers organization. Rental PPOs are referred to as "silent PPOs" in which employers or health plans pay for access to network discounts without clearly disclosing that they are doing so.

In the First Health Group case, defendants included some self-insured employers and some health plans that were accessing the First Health workers' compensation network. Louisiana workers' compensation care is supposed to be paid under a fee schedule set by the state.

The plaintiffs alleged that they were not properly notified that payers were accessing the First Health network discount rates rather than paying according to the state's fee schedule. Louisiana state law requires notification of rental network arrangements.

The case has been taken through state and federal courts, and the remaining disputes center on which is the proper venue and whether the state court's summary judgment should stand.

The Louisiana State Medical Society filed an amicus brief for the plaintiffs with the state Supreme Court on Aug. 2, asking it to reaffirm the lower court finding that payers in Louisiana are not allowed to access network discounts for workers' compensation cases and must pay according to the state's fee schedule.

While appeals work their way through the court system, however, Coventry must account for the settlement they have been ordered to pay. The company recorded the $278 million charge in their second-quarter earnings statements.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story