government

AMA calls on Congress to block ICD-10 mandate on doctors

Switching to new diagnosis codes would create a significant administrative burden to physician practices at a very inopportune time, the Association says.

By Charles Fiegl amednews staff — Posted Feb. 6, 2012

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Citing high implementation costs and coinciding federal mandates, the American Medical Association has urged House Speaker John Boehner (R, Ohio) to stop the switch to the new diagnosis coding sets known as ICD-10.

Requiring doctors to use ICD-10 would offer no direct benefit to patient care, said AMA Executive Vice President and CEO James L. Madara, MD, in a Jan. 17 letter to Boehner. He said requiring all physician practices to use new diagnosis codes starting Oct. 1, 2013, also would interfere with concurrent efforts by doctors to implement electronic medical records and satisfy other Medicare quality improvement requirements. AMA delegates adopted policy opposing the switch to the enhanced code sets during the Association's Interim Meeting in November 2011, but Dr. Madara's letter is the next step toward effecting a legislative solution.

"Stopping the implementation of ICD-10, and calling on appropriate stakeholders including physicians, hospitals, payers, national and state medical and informatics associations, to assess an appropriate replacement for ICD-9 will help to keep adoption of EMRs and physician participation in quality and health IT programs on track and reduce costly burdens on physician practices," Dr. Madara wrote.

In January 2009, the Health and Human Services Dept. published rules requiring new standards under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the transition to ICD-10. Physician practices must start using the new diagnosis codes by Oct. 1, 2013, or Medicare claims will not be paid. Practices will continue to use CPT codes to bill for services they provide based on the diagnosis.

ICD-10 contains about 68,000 codes, while the current ICD-9 standard has only about 13,000 codes. The AMA says the switch represents a significant administrative burden, as the costs of implementing ICD-10 range from about $83,000 to $2.7 million depending on the size of the physician practice.

However, health technology industry groups have defended the push to update ICD-9, which is more than 30 years old. They say the more expansive code sets would allow much more specificity in identifying diagnoses and lead to care improvements.

Implementation won't be as expensive as some have estimated, said Sue Bowman, director of coding policy and compliance at the American Health Information Management Assn. A physician practice implementing an EMR system that is ICD-10 ready now, for instance, would save the practice the expense of retrofitting the system in 2013.

The current ICD-9 codes do not support advancements in the medical industry, said Juliet Santos, a senior director with the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. The alphanumeric ICD-10 code sets leave more space for the future addition of new diagnostic procedures and other medical advances.

Using ICD-10 codes would allow physician offices to capture more detailed information about patients, and practices might find it easier to bill for services. "When a physician is negotiating payer contracts, they have a stronger case to support what they are billing," Santos said.

Physicians should not be shocked by the number of codes in ICD-10, she added. Right now, no doctor would use or need to know all ICD-9 codes.

Doctors and their office staff mainly focus on the codes that apply to the practice's specialty, and that wouldn't change.

But the timing of the transition could not be worse for physicians, Dr. Madara said. Practices are adopting EMR systems under Medicare incentives, and 2013 marks the first reporting year for which doctors face potential payment penalties under quality reporting and value-based purchasing requirements. In addition, Medicare payment rates have remained unstable as the sustainable growth rate formula continues to mandate across-the-board cuts.

The AMA has called on lawmakers to synchronize federal incentive programs. Electronic prescribing, EMR meaningful use and physician quality reporting programs have separate requirements, but they have overlapped and created situations where physicians can be penalized unfairly for choosing one program over the other, the Association has said.

By coming up with a better sequence for Medicare incentives and coordinating their requirements, Congress can ensure that the system is better prepared for health reform, Dr. Madara said. "The struggle to keep up with the various health IT use and reporting requirements leaves little time for physicians to get engaged in the practice redesign and payment and delivery reforms envisioned in the Affordable Care Act."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

ICD-10 codes largely set

The Dept. of Health and Human Services in January 2009 published rules for transitioning the health system to ICD-10 code sets and upgraded HIPAA standards. With the exception of limited updates that will be made later this year, the ICD-10 diagnosis codes have been set.

Oct. 1, 2011: The last regular updates were made to ICD-9 and ICD-10 code sets.

Oct. 1, 2012: Only limited updates will be made to ICD-9 and ICD-10.

Oct. 1, 2013: Claims for physician services must be using ICD-10.

Source: "ICD-10 Code Set to Replace ICD-9," American Medical Association (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story