government

White House contraceptive coverage plan faces opposition

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted Feb. 11, 2013

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A proposal from the Dept. of Health and Human Services for health plans to provide free contraceptives to women while attempting to respect the views of religious organizations did not go far enough to address the perspective of secular for-profit employers, some groups said.

Under a mandate of the Affordable Care Act, most insurance plans now cover contraception without any cost-sharing provisions, although some nonprofit religious hospitals and institutions of higher education object to the use of contraception due to religious beliefs. In its proposed new rule, HHS said these types of organizations would not have to arrange, pay for, refer for or contract for any contraceptive coverage they found objectionable. It also expands the list of “religious employers” to which this new policy would apply.

Instead, women would be able to receive coverage for such preventive services through separate individual health insurance policies without co-pays. HHS projects that the added costs to both insurers and third-party administrators would be offset by several factors, one of which is fewer childbirths that will result from more women having access to contraceptives.

But the conservative American Center for Law and Justice said the attempt at compromise falls short. It doesn’t apply to for-profit secular businesses that object to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate, the center said in a statement. The center has filed several lawsuits on behalf of for-profit companies that are challenging the ACA’s contraceptive mandate on religious grounds.

Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, appeared confident that the courts would overturn the policy. “Unfortunately, this White House doesn’t seem to believe in that constitutional guarantee — forcing private companies to provide health care services in violation of their beliefs.” In particular, this violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, he said.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story