government

Projected impact of ACA employer mandate delay is small

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted July 29, 2013

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Delaying the Affordable Care Act’s individual coverage mandate would affect coverage much more significantly than postponing the law’s employer mandate, the Urban Institute concluded in a report.

In early July, the Obama administration decided to postpone until 2015 the ACA’s mandate requiring that employers with 50 or more full-time employees offer a minimum level of coverage to workers or pay potential penalties. According to the report, a one-year delay would have a negligible effect on coverage. Without this requirement, the uninsured rate is expected to decrease to 10.2%, compared with 10.1% under full ACA implementation.

“Most employers offer coverage today, when they face no penalty, and they will, by and large, continue to do so under the ACA,” the report stated. The delay also should have little effect on costs, as premium and cost-sharing subsidies paid by the federal government through the exchanges would drop by only 1%.

Insurance coverage, however, would decline significantly if the ACA individual mandate were eliminated. At least 13.7 million additional people would remain without insurance if they weren’t required to obtain coverage or pay a tax penalty. But even without this requirement, coverage levels still would be higher before the ACA because more people starting in 2014 would seek coverage under expanded Medicaid programs and through subsidized coverage in the nongroup insurance exchange market, the report stated.

GOP lawmakers have pushed legislation to delay both the individual and employer mandates by one year. Rep. Phil Roe, MD (R, Tenn.), said he was “extremely disappointed to see the administration give protection to businesses by delaying the employer mandate while still requiring individuals to purchase health insurance.”

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story