Profession

AMA apologizes for past inequality against black doctors

Black physician leaders welcome the apology but call for more efforts to diversify the physician work force and reduce racial health disparities.

By — Posted July 28, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The American Medical Association officially apologized in July for its history of excluding black physicians from membership, for listing black doctors as "colored" in its national physician directory for decades, and for failing to speak against federal funding of segregated hospitals and in favor of civil rights legislation.

"The AMA failed, across the span of a century, to live up to the high standards that define the noble profession of medicine," said AMA Immediate Past President Ron Davis, MD, in a commentary published in the July 16 Journal of the American Medical Association.

The apology came in response to an AMA-appointed expert panel's report on the historical racial divide in organized medicine, "African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1968: Origins of a Racial Divide," also published in JAMA.

Former AMA President John C. Nelson, MD, MPH, personally apologized in 2005 for the Association's history of excluding black physicians, but the latest apology is an official statement of the AMA Board of Trustees.

Dr. Davis said the AMA is committed to increasing the number of minority physicians and improving its relationship with minority doctors. The AMA's Minority Affairs Consortium developed the Doctors Back to School program, which has sent physician volunteers to talk with more than 13,000 students from underrepresented groups about careers in medicine. Also, the AMA each year awards $10,000 scholarships to minority scholars -- more than $100,000 was awarded this year.

In a statement, National Medical Assn. President Nelson L. Adams, MD, commended the AMA for taking a "courageous step and coming to grips with a litany of discriminatory practices that have had a devastating effect on the health of African-Americans."

Dr. Adams urged the AMA to join the NMA in an effort to recruit more blacks into medicine, reduce racial health disparities and mandate cultural competency training as part of medical education and licensure. In 2004, the two organizations formed the Commission to End Health Care Disparities.

Randall W. Maxey, MD, PhD, the inaugural co-chair of the commission and a former NMA president, said the AMA's apology "opens the door to forward-looking cooperation" between the AMA and the NMA. Dr. Maxey, president of the Alliance of Minority Medical Assns., called for an annual summit meeting of high-level leaders of the AMA and the NMA. Dr. Davis called the proposal a "great idea."

Anne C. Beal, MD, MPH, called the AMA's apology "an important first step." The matter is not "ancient history," because if it were, "we wouldn't be dealing with racial disparities in health care and health care outcomes. This is still something we're working with and dealing with today," said Dr. Beal, assistant vice president for the Program on Quality of Care for Underserved Populations at the Commonwealth Fund in New York City.

Lonnie Bristow, MD, who became the AMA's first black president in 1995, said the apology "shows a mature perspective, and by comparison to the other institutions in our nation, including our government, the AMA is leading the way."

"That's what the AMA has always done," he said. "But it has also been a mirror reflecting American society."

The AMA's history of allowing discrimination goes back to its very beginnings, according to the panel's report. The Association's acknowledged founder, Nathan Smith Davis, MD, was crucial to the 1870 effort to exclude the integrated National Medical Society from admission to the AMA.

Four years later, the AMA adopted policy that effectively allowed each state to decide whether to let black physicians become members. Nearly all southern state medical societies barred black doctors from joining.

It wasn't until 1968 that the AMA threatened to expel organizations with racially exclusionary policies.

Robert Baker, PhD, lead author of the panel's report, said he was impressed that the AMA appointed an independent panel to examine its history and took the report seriously.

"They had no way of knowing what we would find and how we would parse it," said Baker, a bioethicist who served as a visiting scholar at the AMA in 2005. "There are very few institutions in American society willing to be that transparent and open about the past."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Black doctors and the AMA: A timeline

1870: The integrated National Medical Society delegation is excluded from the AMA Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C.

1874: The AMA adopts a system of governance allowing state medical societies to determine which local societies will be recognized at AMA meetings, effectively allowing each state to decide the question of racial segregation.

1910: The AMA-requested Flexner Report, Medical Education in the United States and Canada, is published; the report recommends that all but two black medical schools be shut down.

1939: The AMA discontinues its policy of listing black physicians as "colored" in its American Medical Directory. The House of Delegates adopts policy discouraging racial discrimination in constituent society membership but allows it to continue.

1965-1968: The National Medical Assn. and the Medical Committee for Human Rights picket the AMA's meetings, protesting the Association's lack of action on state and county medical societies' racial exclusion policies.

1968: The AMA House of Delegates threatens to expel from the Association any state medical society that discriminates on the basis of race.

2004: The AMA and the NMA convene the Commission to End Health Care Disparities.

Source: "African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1968: Origins of a Racial Divide," Journal of the American Medical Association, July 16

Back to top


External links

"The history of African-Americans and organized medicine," American Medical Association (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story