Physicians sanctioned in board exam cheating scandal

The internal medicine board disciplined more than 100 doctors and sued five for allegedly exchanging copyrighted questions from the board's certification exam.

By — Posted June 21, 2010

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The American Board of Internal Medicine has sanctioned 139 physicians for allegedly exchanging test questions from the board's certification exam.

Five physicians also face complaints filed by the board in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The board is claiming copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract.

The board's actions come five months after the organization sued Arora Board Review and its owners, claiming copyright infringement and theft of trade secrets. The 139 sanctioned physicians had participated in an exam preparation course offered by the New Jersey-based company and had disclosed to Arora officials actual board questions.

The ABIM and Arora Board Review have reached a settlement in that case, including a provision that the company's manager no longer can operate a live board review course, according to ABIM officials. Arora Board Review did not admit wrongdoing.

Christine K. Cassel, MD, ABIM president and chief executive officer, said board staff first learned of problems about a year ago, when they found copyrighted exam questions on Arora's website. The ABIM ultimately removed hundreds of compromised questions from its exam.

"At the Arora Board Review courses, [the manager] was not only bragging that he had ABIM questions but soliciting people who remembered questions to report them back to him," Dr. Cassel said.

Camille Miller, an attorney representing the Arora Board Review, said the organization objects to the ABIM's actions against physicians.

"Physicians routinely discuss examination content with others, and ABIM has not apparently enforced this consistently against other physicians," according to a statement by Miller, of the Cozen O'Connor law firm in Philadelphia.

Humayun Chaudhry, DO, president and chief executive officer of the Federation of State Medical Boards, said physicians bring "disrepute" on the profession by exchanging board exam questions.

"Cheating on a board certification exam is a serious matter which calls into question a physician's character," he said.

Dr. Chaudhry said he believes this is the largest case of organized physician misconduct. State licensing boards may choose to take further action.

"It could call into question the validity of their medical license," Dr. Chaudhry said.

Kevin B. Weiss, MD, MPH, president and chief executive officer of the American Board of Medical Specialties, said he was disappointed in the physicians involved. "I believe ABIM took the appropriate steps necessary to protect the public and other physicians in the profession."

The 24 member boards of the ABMS have rules and procedures to guard against cheating. Dr. Cassel said physicians must sign a "pledge of honesty" that appears in bold three times during the exam and says they will not disclose, copy or reproduce any of the material, and warns of severe penalties if they do.

The 139 physicians sanctioned by the ABIM were notified June 9. Their penalties include revocation of board certification or suspension of certification for one to five years, depending on the severity of the offense. Some noncertified physicians involved will have to wait a year or more before seeking certification.

Physicians can appeal the board's decision within about two months, after which the ABIM will begin notifying state medical licensing boards of its actions, Dr. Cassel said.

The ABIM plans to send warning letters to more than 1,000 other physicians who took the course and didn't report instructors' claims that they provided access to actual ABIM questions.

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story