opinion

EHR vendors must find solutions to physicians’ usability concerns

LETTER — Posted April 29, 2013

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Regarding “Vendor misconceptions hamper EHR usability” (Column, April 1): I enjoyed your article and find our current dilemma as physicians frustrating. We are mandated to use electronic health records, which in many cases often aren’t ready for prime time. The disruption of work flow and creation of complexity to accomplish simple tasks are among the most frustrating aspects.

As a pediatrician in a busy office, I am most concerned about providing high-quality, personalized care in a timely fashion and documenting the necessary information so anyone can use the documentation to see what was accomplished. Our EHR demands that I take an additional two to five minutes (or more) per patient to type in data and navigate through a number of screens to code, bill and update past information. All of these things interfere with patient interaction and create a time crunch that makes seeing patients difficult and rushed. The focus is on the documentation rather than the patient. Also, there are numerous steps added to the work flow that take extra time and bog down the entire process. We all see fewer patients since implementing EHRs two years ago and take more time to do it.

We are on our second EHR, because the first one was even worse than our current one. While we did do our “due diligence,” the product choices were all very similar and failed to really provide anything very different from each other. All have the same usability problems in my search.

I consider myself to be technically savvy. I toy around with programming and Web design. I run Linux and build computers. I see how computers can become a useful tool in a physician’s office, but the current products all fail to provide value for us. Vendors shun us as “silly physicians” who aren’t smart enough or flexible enough to accept change. While there are always some of those, most of us just want something that will allow us to do the work we do — see patients — without creating extra steps or effort to the process.

Because we are mandated to use EHRs, we can’t wait for the products to evolve into something useful. We have to purchase them now — something most of us never would have done at this stage. The fact that vendors are benefiting from sales takes away motivation to improve them. Changing from one EHR to another is onerous and very costly. As a result, once you buy one, you become stuck whether you like it or not.

I would love to help move the process along and make the industry come up with better solutions, but I am afraid we are trapped with garbage. If you can connect me to anyone or any group that is working to fix this problem I would be ecstatic.

Dave Denton, MD, Pocatello, Idaho

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story