government

Doctors, hospitals unite to improve meaningful use stage 2

The American Medical Association and the American Hospital Assn. are urging that the next phase of the federal EHR program not leave adopters behind.

By Charles Fiegl — Posted Aug. 5, 2013

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Predicted problems that physicians and hospitals will encounter in upgrading and using electronic health record systems with new functionality mandated by the federal government have prompted an urgent call for additional flexibility from users of the technology.

The transition dates to move to stage 2 of the program for demonstrating meaningful use of an EHR system are near, and they may leave some physicians and hospitals behind, the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Assn. warned in a joint July 23 letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Vendor readiness in creating software that complies with robust criteria developed by HHS is just one of many concerns shared by physicians and hospitals. They are worried that problems will put practices and facilities in the position of needing to throw out their EHRs and buy new systems, or else fall short of requirements and pay a financial price through missed bonuses and future Medicare penalties.

The AMA and AHA have found that many stakeholders, including the vendors designing the systems, are not ready and will struggle to move to stage 2 after investing significant time and money during stage 1. An estimated 500,000 hospitals and physicians who met requirements for stage 1 beginning in 2011 or 2012 will go to the next level of adoption. Hospitals are scheduled to begin stage 2 on Oct. 1, with physicians following on Jan. 1, 2014.

“Our members share the administration's commitment to the widespread adoption of EHRs; however, we believe that the best way to move the program forward and ensure that no providers, particularly small and rural ones, are left behind is to realign the meaningful use program's current requirements to ensure a safe, orderly transition to stage 2,” the joint letter stated.

Only 11 EHR products designed for physician offices have completed 2014 certification requirements for stage 2 as of July 17, even though about 1,300 products had been certified under stage 1 standards. Physicians and hospitals will be pressed to upgrade systems, and the vendors probably will experience a surge of EHR users, which could drive up prices for systems and consulting, the associations said.

“These time constraints are exacerbated by the need for health care providers to meet coinciding federal requirements, such as the transition to ICD-10 by Oct. 1, 2014,” the letter stated.

The AMA will continue urging the Obama administration to make necessary changes to stage 2 and increase efforts to improve the usability of these systems for physicians, said AMA Immediate Past Chair Steven J. Stack, MD. Stage 2 is considerably tougher than stage 1. Physician systems will be expected to exchange data and communicate electronically more with patients.

“The AMA is increasingly alarmed at the pace the meaningful use program is moving ahead without a mechanism to correct the program as we learn from provider and vendor experiences over the past few years,” Dr. Stack said. “It is clear from the experience in stage 1 that unless stage 2 requirements are modified to allow greater flexibility for physicians, particularly specialists, not only will many physicians not qualify for incentives, they'll also be hit with a penalty. We continue to strongly urge the administration to revise stage 2 criteria and require EHRs to meet more usability criteria to achieve certification.”

Physicians new to the incentive program spend two years in stage 1 before progressing to stage 2. Since 2011, Medicare and Medicaid have offered bonuses for adopting the paperless systems. In Medicare, the incentives begin to turn into penalties for nonadopters in 2015. Physicians must start achieving requirements for meaningful use by July 2014 — and attest that they have done so by Oct. 1, 2014 — to prevent their 2015 Medicare pay being lowered by 1%.

White House resistance to delays

While the AMA and AHA fight for more flexibility in the program, administration officials have rejected calls to halt or further delay stage 2. In December 2011, HHS granted physicians who first reported meeting stage 1 that year a one-year reprieve from moving onto the next stage. Previously, early adopters had been scheduled to begin stage 2 in 2013.

Stage 2 represents a big step forward on patient engagement through EHRs and on system interoperability, said Farzad Mostashari, MD, the HHS national coordinator for health information technology, during a July 17 Senate Finance Committee hearing. Dr. Mostashari was asked by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R, Utah) if pausing the program temporarily to evaluate progress to date and assess the government's return on investment into EHR adoption would be a good idea. A pause also would involve a delay in penalties to nonadopters of EHR systems.

“No, sir,” Dr. Mostashari responded. “I believe a pause in the program would stall the progress that's been hard-fought. With the movement we've accomplished through stage 1, we need to give stage 2 a chance to move ahead and to meet the urgency of the moment in providing support for coordinated care for the transformation of health care. A pause would take momentum away from progress.”

Vendors, others sound alarm

The challenges for physicians and hospitals who already met the stage 1 criteria are daunting. These EHR users will be required to move to stage 2 with new editions of certified technology, while at the same time preparing for and switching to the ICD-10 diagnosis coding sets and adapting to upcoming payment reforms in Medicare, Medicaid and the private sector, John Glaser, PhD, CEO of health services for Siemens Healthcare, said at a second Senate Finance Committee on July 24.

Federal officials should extend stage 2 deadlines until Oct. 1, 2015, Glaser told the Finance Committee. Adopters also should be given three years under stage 2 before being mandated to move to the third and final stage, currently set at 2016 for early adopters.

“The industry overall is challenged to address the demands of stages 1, 2 and 3,” Glaser said. “So the vendors are challenged with staffing, as are the providers.”

Physicians at small and rural hospitals in particular are in danger of coming up short in the process, Marty Fattig, CEO of Nemaha County Hospital in Auburn, Neb., told the July 24 hearing. The hospital expects to move forward to stage 2 in mid- to late 2014, but only after it purchases new software and adjusts its work flow. For instance, a secure patient portal must be brought online, along with an interface that enables public health reporting to state officials. He said some may find that current vendors won't be able to satisfy the new standards, and many lack the financial resources to adapt to the evolving EHR program.

“I believe policymakers will need to make changes to the meaningful use program to ensure small and rural hospitals are not left behind as we make the transition to stage 2 of meaningful use,” Fattig said.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

AMA-AHA advice on meaningful use stage 2

Changes to the federal statute governing the meaningful use of electronic health records would allow for more flexibility as physicians and hospitals transition to the next phase of the program. The American Medical Association and the American Hospital Assn. wrote a joint letter to the Health and Human Services secretary offering recommendations on how to introduce needed flexibility to the EHR incentive program and provide time for vendors to build and install new software upgrades.

  • Allow health professionals at stage 1 to meet meaningful use requirements using either 2011 certified edition EHRs or 2014 certified edition EHRs.
  • Establish a 90-day reporting period for the first year of each new stage of meaningful use for all health professionals, similar to what was allowed for stage 1.
  • Allow physicians and hospitals in meeting stage 2 to avoid the “all or nothing” problem with requirements and recognize that the level of change desired in stage 2 will take time to accomplish.
  • Extend each stage of meaningful use to no fewer than three years for all health professionals.

Source: American Medical Association-American Hospital Assn. letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, July 23 (link)

Back to top


External links

American Medical Association-American Hospital Assn. letter to Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, July 23 (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story